On 06/09/18 16:32, Paul Durrant wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Xen-devel [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf >> Of Paul Durrant >> Sent: 23 August 2018 09:38 >> To: Andrew Cooper <[email protected]>; xen- >> [email protected] >> Cc: Jan Beulich <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/hvm/viridian: set shutdown_code in >> response to CrashNotify >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Andrew Cooper >>> Sent: 16 August 2018 10:40 >>> To: Paul Durrant <[email protected]>; xen- >> [email protected] >>> Cc: Jan Beulich <[email protected]> >>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/hvm/viridian: set shutdown_code in response to >>> CrashNotify >>> >>> On 10/08/18 16:59, Paul Durrant wrote: >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Andrew Cooper >>>>> Sent: 10 August 2018 16:57 >>>>> To: Paul Durrant <[email protected]>; xen- >>> [email protected] >>>>> Cc: Jan Beulich <[email protected]> >>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/hvm/viridian: set shutdown_code in response >>> to >>>>> CrashNotify >>>>> >>>>> On 10/08/18 16:43, Paul Durrant wrote: >>>>>> When Windows writes the CrashNotify bit in the CRASH_CTL MSR then >>> we >>>>> know >>>>>> it is crashing, so set the domain shutdown code appropriately. >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <[email protected]> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> Cc: Jan Beulich <[email protected]> >>>>>> Cc: Andrew Cooper <[email protected]> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> xen/arch/x86/hvm/viridian.c | 4 ++++ >>>>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) >>>>>> >>>>>> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/viridian.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/viridian.c >>>>>> index 486065182c..294cf486cc 100644 >>>>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/viridian.c >>>>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/viridian.c >>>>>> @@ -645,6 +645,10 @@ int wrmsr_viridian_regs(uint32_t idx, uint64_t >>> val) >>>>>> if ( !ctl.u.CrashNotify ) >>>>>> break; >>>>>> >>>>>> + spin_lock(&d->shutdown_lock); >>>>>> + d->shutdown_code = SHUTDOWN_crash; >>>>>> + spin_unlock(&d->shutdown_lock); >>>>> How does the domain eventually shut down? >>>> I assume it shuts down when the guest writes to the PIIX. >>>> >>>>> It feels slightly odd to have >>>>> a shutdown code before the domain has finished executing code. >>>>> >>>> That's the norm. The PV drivers (if they are installed) set it via a >>>> schedop. >>> This just makes sure it is set even if the PV drivers aren't there. >>> >>> What happens if the user has configured windows to reboot after a crash? >>> >> That's exactly what this is trying to fix. Without the patch a VM without PV >> drivers will appear to just shut down (because nothing will set the shutdown >> code to anything else) so the actions-after-crash will not take effect. >> > Ping? Are you ok with the patch now?
Lol - I was literally just trying to find it. I'll commit it in a moment. ~Andrew _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
