On Fri, Mar 06, 2026 at 08:59:07AM +0530, Soumyajyotii Ssarkar wrote: > On Fri, Mar 6, 2026 at 7:23 AM Marek Marczykowski-Górecki < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 06, 2026 at 12:48:09AM +0530, Soumyajyotii Ssarkar wrote: > > > Now that BGRT images are preserved during EFI boot (via > > > EfiACPIReclaimMemory allocation), the invalidation code in > > > acpi_parse_bgrt() is no longer needed. The BGRT table remains > > > valid throughout boot. > > > > > > This removes the code that was marking BGRT invalid when the > > > image memory was detected as unavailable, which was causing > > > ACPI warnings in Linux dom0. > > > > When preserving failed for any reason, or when it was disabled (the next > > patch), the entry still should be invalidated. In fact, the check here > > for RAM_TYPE_CONVENTIONAL may already disable invalidation when it got > > preserved? > > > > -- > > Best Regards, > > Marek Marczykowski-Górecki > > Invisible Things Lab > > > > > I could move forward with dropping the [PATCH 2/3]. And adapt the other > patches accordingly. > This would serve as a safety net in case the preservation fails for any > reason. Would that be a valid approach?
Yes, exactly. -- Best Regards, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki Invisible Things Lab
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
