On 23/02/2026 7:26 am, Roberto Bagnara wrote: > On 20/02/26 22:46, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> Eclair complains of a side effect in a sizeof() expression (R13.6). > > I disagree with comments of the form "Eclair complains"
We use the same phrasing with other tools too, but I can change it to "reports" which I suppose is a more neutral term. > > Note that in recent versions of MISRA C that rule is no longer > mandatory. More generally, note also that, IMHO, switching to > a more modern version of MISRA C would simplify compliance. Ok. Making things simpler for compliance sounds like a good thing. What would this entail? Presumably we've got to adapt to all changes in this newer revision of MISRA C. ~Andrew
