Hi Jan,

> On 5 Feb 2026, at 12:45, Jan Beulich <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On 05.02.2026 12:33, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
>> GNU make 4.4+ exposes variable overrides in MAKEFLAGS after "--" (e.g.
>> O=/path, FOO=bar). The silent-mode check searches for "s" and can match
>> an override value, forcing silent output even without -s.
>> 
>> Use MFLAGS for short options and filter out any long options before
>> searching for "s". This preserves -s detection while avoiding false
>> positives from overrides.
>> 
>> Fixes: 4fdb4b71b152 ("xen/build: introduce if_changed and if_changed_rule")
> 
> I don't think this is quite right: make 4.4 post-dates that commit by about
> 2.5 years.

True, we can remove the fixes tag.

> 
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Bertrand Marquis <[email protected]>
> 
> Nit: No blank lines between tags, please.

Ack

> 
>> --- a/xen/Makefile
>> +++ b/xen/Makefile
>> @@ -113,10 +113,11 @@ else
>>     Q := @
>> endif
>> 
>> -# If the user is running make -s (silent mode), suppress echoing of
>> -# commands
>> -
>> -ifneq ($(findstring s,$(filter-out --%,$(MAKEFLAGS))),)
>> +# If the user is running make -s (silent mode), suppress echoing of 
>> commands.
>> +# Use MFLAGS (short options only). MAKEFLAGS may include variable overrides
> 
> Why "short options only"? It looks you mean to describe the macro here, not
> what's done in the ifeq(); at the very least it can be read both ways.

True should be.
Filter short options from MFLAGS.

> 
>> +# after ā€œ--ā€ (GNU make greater than 4.4), which can contain an ā€œsā€ and 
>> falsely
> 
> 4.4 and newer really, as 4.4 itself is included in the affected range. I'm
> not quite sure anyway whether the comment really needs to go this far. This
> kind of detail can be had from the commit message of this change, if needed.
> 
> Happy to make adjustments while committing, yet I'm not sure whether you
> agree in all regards.

Agree.

If you agree and can do that on commit, i would just put:

Filter short options from MFLAGS as MAKEFLAGS may include variable overrides.

Cheers
Bertrand

> 
> Jan

Reply via email to