On 28/11/2025 14:55, Alexander Gordeev wrote: >> + * in_lazy_mmu_mode() can be used to check whether the lazy MMU mode is >> + * currently enabled. > The in_lazy_mmu_mode() name looks ambiguous to me. When the lazy MMU mode > is paused are we still in lazy MMU mode? The __task_lazy_mmu_mode_active() > implementation suggests we are not, while one could still assume we are, > just paused. > > Should in_lazy_mmu_mode() be named e.g. as in_active_lazy_mmu_mode() such > a confusion would not occur in the first place.
I see your point, how about is_lazy_mmu_mode_active()? - Kevin
