Hi

Sorry for the late comment.

On 27.11.25 18:26, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
From: Roger Pau Monne <[email protected]>

Move x86's free_domain_struct() to common code since it is shared between
architectures.

Move the x86 version of alloc_domain_struct() to common code as most of the
logic is architecture-independent. To handle the remaining architectural
differences, introduce arch_domain_struct_memflags() for x86-specific
allocation requirements.

No functional change.

Suggested-by: Jan Beulich <[email protected]>
[Introduce an arch-specific function instead of using a weak function]
Signed-off-by: Roger Pau MonnĂ© <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Oleksii Kurochko <[email protected]>
---
Changes in v3:
  - s/arch_alloc_domain_struct_bits/arch_domain_struct_memflags.
  - Make x86's arch_domain_struct_memflags() to return MEMF_bits(bits) instead
    of bits.
  - Move "#define arch_domain_struct_memflags arch_domain_struct_memflags"
    and declaration of arch_domain_struct_memflags() from x86/asm/pv/domain.h
    to x86/domain.h.
  - Update alloc_domain_struct() to work with arch_domain_struct_memflags().
  - s/Suggested-By/Suggested-by.
  - CI tests: 
https://gitlab.com/xen-project/people/olkur/xen/-/pipelines/2182821111
---
Changes in v2:
- Introduce an arch-specific function to handle differences between arch-es
   in domain structure allocation requirements, instead of relying on a weak
   function.
- Move free_domain_struct() to common code.
- Add Suggested-by: Jan Beulich <[email protected]>.
- Update the commit message.
- Link to original patch:
   
https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/c08595dd7940b44a1392e16d4a2035b95b5c580b.1749829230.git.oleksii.kuroc...@gmail.com/
---
  xen/arch/arm/domain.c             | 17 -----------------
  xen/arch/ppc/stubs.c              | 10 ----------
  xen/arch/riscv/stubs.c            | 10 ----------
  xen/arch/x86/domain.c             | 15 ++-------------
  xen/arch/x86/include/asm/domain.h |  3 +++
  xen/common/domain.c               | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
  6 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)


[...]

struct vcpu *alloc_vcpu_struct(const struct domain *d)
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/domain.h 
b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/domain.h
index 5df8c78253..386ec61745 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/domain.h
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/domain.h
@@ -12,6 +12,9 @@
  #include <public/vcpu.h>
  #include <public/hvm/hvm_info_table.h>
+unsigned int arch_domain_struct_memflags(void);
+#define arch_domain_struct_memflags arch_domain_struct_memflags
+
  #define has_32bit_shinfo(d)    ((d)->arch.has_32bit_shinfo)
/*
diff --git a/xen/common/domain.c b/xen/common/domain.c
index 3b6e9471c4..2e8d74cbd9 100644
--- a/xen/common/domain.c
+++ b/xen/common/domain.c
@@ -799,6 +799,28 @@ static int sanitise_domain_config(struct 
xen_domctl_createdomain *config)
      return arch_sanitise_domain_config(config);
  }
+struct domain *alloc_domain_struct(void)
+{
+#ifndef arch_domain_struct_memflags
+# define arch_domain_struct_memflags() 0
+#endif

Is it really the right way to
hide part of common interface in common code instead of header?


+
+    struct domain *d;
+
+    BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*d) > PAGE_SIZE);
+
+    d = alloc_xenheap_pages(0, arch_domain_struct_memflags());
+    if ( d != NULL )
+        clear_page(d);
+
+    return d;
+}
+
+void free_domain_struct(struct domain *d)
+{
+    free_xenheap_page(d);
+}
+
  struct domain *domain_create(domid_t domid,
                               struct xen_domctl_createdomain *config,
                               unsigned int flags)

--
Best regards,
-grygorii


Reply via email to