On 25/07/18 17:29, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 25/07/18 18:12, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 05:05:35PM +0300, [email protected] wrote:
>>> On 07/25/2018 05:02 PM, Wei Liu wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 03:41:11PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>>>> On 25/07/18 15:35, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>>>>>> What could be causing the available memory loss problem?
>>>>>> That seems to be Linux aggressively ballooning out memory, you go from
>>>>>> 7129M total memory to 246M. Are you creating a lot of domains?
>>>>> This might be related to the tools thinking dom0 is a PV domain.
>>>> Good point.
>>>>
>>>> In that case, xenstore-ls -fp would also be useful. The output should
>>>> show the balloon target for Dom0.
>>>>
>>>> You can also try to set the autoballoon to off in /etc/xen/xl.cfg to see
>>>> if it makes any difference.
>>>>
>>>> Wei.
>>> Also tried setting autoballooning off, but it had no effect.
>> This is a Linux/libxl issue that I'm not sure what's the best way to
>> solve. Linux has the following 'workaround' in the balloon driver:
>>
>> err = xenbus_scanf(XBT_NIL, "memory", "static-max", "%llu",
>> &static_max);
>> if (err != 1)
>> static_max = new_target;
>> else
>> static_max >>= PAGE_SHIFT - 10;
>> target_diff = xen_pv_domain() ? 0
>> : static_max - balloon_stats.target_pages;
> Hmm, shouldn't PVH behave the same way as PV here? I don't think
> there is memory missing for PVH, opposed to HVM's firmware memory.
>
> Adding Boris for a second opinion.
/sigh
<rant>
Ballooning, and guest memory accounting is a known, growing, clustermess
of swamps. The ballooning protocol itself is sufficiently broken as to
be useless outside of contrived scenarios, owing to the lack of any
ability to nack the request and the guest not knowing or being able to
work out how much RAM it actually has.
The Xen/toolstack/qemu-{trad,upstream}/hvmloader guessathon contributes
to lots of corner cases where things explode spectacularly on migration,
such as having more than 4 network cards, or having vram != 64M, or
generally anything involving PCI Passthrough.
Can we take this hint that maybe its time to try fixing the problem
properly rather than applying even more duct tape? I'd like to remind
people that there is a design which has been discussed at various
conferences in the past, not not overly objected to.
</rant>
~Andrew
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
