On 24/11/2025 3:17 pm, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 24.11.2025 16:08, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <[email protected]> > Acked-by: Jan Beulich <[email protected]>
Thanks. > >> I'm unsure about the Intel CPU Core types, but it's probably better to keep >> them than strip them from our copy. > Did you mean "pre-Core" here? In any event, as we're meaning to stay in sync, > we can as well do so properly. No, I mean the enum's at the bottom. > >> @@ -152,9 +174,9 @@ >> #define INTEL_ATOM_SILVERMONT IFM(6, 0x37) /* Bay Trail, >> Valleyview */ >> #define INTEL_ATOM_SILVERMONT_D IFM(6, 0x4D) /* Avaton, Rangely >> */ >> #define INTEL_ATOM_SILVERMONT_MID IFM(6, 0x4A) /* Merriefield */ >> +#define INTEL_ATOM_SILVERMONT_MID2 IFM(6, 0x5A) /* Anniedale */ >> >> #define INTEL_ATOM_AIRMONT IFM(6, 0x4C) /* Cherry Trail, Braswell >> */ >> -#define INTEL_ATOM_AIRMONT_MID IFM(6, 0x5A) /* Moorefield */ > Interesting, there's one entry changing the group it belongs to. We don't > use the constant anywhere, so right now this is purely a cosmetic change. Christian did some archaeology, and concluded that it was misclassified originally. ~Andrew
