On 29/10/2025 4:14 pm, Timothy Pearson wrote: >> If you're not aware, we do have some PPC64 build jobs and one QEMU boot >> test in CI running on every commit. e.g. >> https://gitlab.com/xen-project/hardware/xen/-/pipelines/2127184050 > Indeed! In fact, if there is any desire for native builds in parallel on our > POWER9 infrastructure we could arrange that as well.
We will need that in due course. Cross-compiling the hypervisor is fine, but the userspace tooling is a different matter. > >> Would you mind changing to R to reflect how things are working in practice? > I can do that. Is there a path where we would want to move that back toward > M or is this decision a wait and see as the port progresses? Yes, there is a path, probably as we get to the point of tech preview. > >> Also, we're in code freeze for the Xen 4.21 release right now. This >> patch will be fine, with a SoB, but the others will have to wait until >> 4.22 opens. > Fair enough, nothing here is time sensitive. Work continues on the port and > patches will start flowing again for 4.22. > > Thanks again, and looking forward to working with you over the coming months! Thanks, ~Andrew
