On Fri, Oct 03, 2025 at 10:09:31AM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > On Thu, Oct 02, 2025 at 07:42:38PM -0400, Jason Andryuk wrote: > > @@ -601,7 +618,8 @@ M: Roger Pau Monné <[email protected]> > > S: Supported > > L: [email protected] > > F: xen/arch/x86/ > > -F: xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/ > > +X: xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/ > > +X: xen/arch/x86/cpu/vpmu_amd.c > > Would it be possible to not exclude the SVM related code here, and > avoid having to duplicate the x86 maintainers on the AMD entries? > > Or the parsing of the file doesn't deal with multiple entries possibly > covering the same files?
./get_maintainer.pl can deal with a file been covered by multiple entries, there's multiple example of that already, (e.g. many subsection are also covered by TOOLSTACK). The exclusion is likely unnecessary, and ./get_maintainer.pl will just get the information (email, ...) from every sections that a file match. But the duplication is necessary due to the "The meaning of nesting" described in the MAINTAINERS file. Cheers, -- Anthony PERARD
