On 08.05.2025 11:43, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 07/05/2025 3:45 pm, Kevin Lampis wrote: >> From: Ross Lagerwall <[email protected]> >> >> This will be used by future patches. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ross Lagerwall <[email protected]> >> Signed-off-by: Kevin Lampis <[email protected]> > > Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <[email protected]>
Like for the sha256 change - isn't this introducing a new Misra violation until a caller appears? Or are we deeming this okay here (unlike in the sha256 case) because the CU will only be included in the final image if a caller actually exists? Jan
