On 12.03.2025 05:10, Penny, Zheng wrote: > [Public] > > Hi, > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Penny, Zheng <[email protected]> >> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2025 12:06 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Cc: Huang, Ray <[email protected]>; Stabellini, Stefano >> <[email protected]>; Andrew Cooper <[email protected]>; >> Anthony PERARD <[email protected]>; Orzel, Michal >> <[email protected]>; Jan Beulich <[email protected]>; Julien Grall >> <[email protected]>; Roger Pau Monné <[email protected]>; Stefano Stabellini >> <[email protected]>; Sergiy Kibrik <[email protected]>; Penny, >> Zheng >> <[email protected]> >> Subject: [PATCH v1 01/19] xen: introduce CONFIG_SYSCTL >> >> From: Stefano Stabellini <[email protected]> >> >> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <[email protected]> >> Signed-off-by: Sergiy Kibrik <[email protected]> >> Signed-off-by: Penny Zheng <[email protected]> >> --- >> xen/common/Kconfig | 9 +++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/xen/common/Kconfig b/xen/common/Kconfig index >> 6166327f4d..72e1d7ea97 100644 >> --- a/xen/common/Kconfig >> +++ b/xen/common/Kconfig >> @@ -519,6 +519,15 @@ config TRACEBUFFER >> to be collected at run time for debugging or performance analysis. >> Memory and execution overhead when not active is minimal. >> >> +menu "Supported hypercall interfaces" >> + visible if EXPERT >> + >> +config SYSCTL >> + bool "Enable sysctl hypercall" >> + depends on !PV_SHIM_EXCLUSIVE > > I'm aware of the commit of "x86: provide an inverted Kconfig control for > shim-exclusive mode"[1] > And I'll rebase whenever it gets merged.
Except that meanwhile it was agreed upon that it won't be merged. Instead iirc the plan is for someone to go and remove all the "depends on !PV_SHIM_EXCLUSIVE". Which means new ones better won't be added anymore. Jan
