Move the check on having a Secure TSC to the common tsc_early_init() so that it's obvious that having a Secure TSC is conditional, and to prepare for adding TDX to the mix (blindly initializing *both* SNP and TDX TSC logic looks especially weird).
No functional change intended. Cc: Nikunj A Dadhania <[email protected]> Cc: Tom Lendacky <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]> --- arch/x86/coco/sev/core.c | 3 --- arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/coco/sev/core.c b/arch/x86/coco/sev/core.c index e6ce4ca72465..dab386f782ce 100644 --- a/arch/x86/coco/sev/core.c +++ b/arch/x86/coco/sev/core.c @@ -3284,9 +3284,6 @@ void __init snp_secure_tsc_init(void) { unsigned long long tsc_freq_mhz; - if (!cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_GUEST_SNP_SECURE_TSC)) - return; - setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_TSC_KNOWN_FREQ); setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE); diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c index 5a16271b7a5c..09ca0cbd4f31 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c @@ -1514,7 +1514,8 @@ void __init tsc_early_init(void) if (is_early_uv_system()) return; - snp_secure_tsc_init(); + if (cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_GUEST_SNP_SECURE_TSC)) + snp_secure_tsc_init(); if (!determine_cpu_tsc_frequencies(true)) return; -- 2.48.1.362.g079036d154-goog
