On 07.01.2025 10:10, Alessandro Zucchelli wrote: > --- a/docs/misra/deviations.rst > +++ b/docs/misra/deviations.rst > @@ -353,6 +353,13 @@ Deviations related to MISRA C:2012 Rules: > Fixing this violation would require to increase code complexity and > lower readability. > - Tagged as `safe` for ECLAIR. > > + * - R11.8 > + - Violations caused by function __hvm_copy occour when a const void > attribute is passed, > + as the const qualifier is stripped. However, in such cases, the > function ensures > + that it does not modify the attribute, therefore, this use is deemed > safe. > + Fixing this violation would require to increase code complexity and > lower readability. > + - Tagged as `safe` for ECLAIR.
Do you really mean "attribute" in both places the word is used? In the first case talk appears to be of a function argument / parameter, while in the second case it looks to be the buffer referenced be the argument / parameter which is meant. Jan
