On 12/4/24 12:01 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 04.12.2024 11:20, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
=== x86 ===
* Expose consistent topology to guests (v7)
- Alejandro Vallejo
-https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/[email protected]/T/#m6033f95c660675039d7789d3af1ba2f292a3a69b
* Boot modules for Hyperlaunch (v8 -> v9)
- Daniel P. Smith
-https://patchew.org/Xen/[email protected]/
* x86/mm: miscellaneous fixes (v2 -> v3)
- Roger Pau Monne
-https://patchew.org/Xen/[email protected]/
This went in, didn't it?
Yes, you are right. It is fully in staging now.
* Address Space Isolation FPU preparations (v2)
- Alejandro Vallejo
-https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/[email protected]/T/#mbca5192d7e5636ef5ea005a083e5ff28ebe6317d
* x86/alternatives: Adjust all insn-relative fields (v2)
- Andrew Cooper
-https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/[email protected]/T/#mac2deaea7e02a343210d61887486433d946ad129
* Support device passthrough when dom0 is PVH on Xen (v16)
- Jiqian Chen
-https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/[email protected]/T/#m5d557d76f290ff5b5550c1443cab5774d397e526
Some of this went in too, I think?
"Support device passthrough when dom0 is PVH on Xen" should be moved to
Completed. ( Accidentally did a grep for the cover letter subject not
for the subject of the 1st patch so though that 1st patch isn't merged.
And it seems to me that it should be mentioned in CHANGELOG.md, shouldn't it?
* x86emul: misc additions (v5 -> v7)
- Jan Beulich
-https://patchew.org/Xen/[email protected]/
* x86/HVM: emulation (MMIO) improvements (v2)
- Jan Beulich
-https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/[email protected]/
* x86: support AVX10.1 (v2)
- Jan Beulich
-https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/[email protected]/
In v2 the title had changed to "x86: support AVX10", dealing with a first
aspect of AVX10.2 as well. I have long completed AVX10.2 work, yet there
was little reason to re-post without having got any feedback.
Thanks, I will update the subject.
* APX support (v?)
- Jan Beulich
- ?
I think you want to remove this from the list. While I have completed work
there, I'm not fancying re-basing ahead of the AVX10 work, and hence that
needs to go in first anyway. Which seems unlikely enough at this point, for
4.20.
* VT-d: SATC handling; ATS: tidying (v2)
- Jan Beulich
-https://patchew.org/Xen/[email protected]/
* x86: parallelize AP bring-up during boot (v1)
- Krystian Hebel
-https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/[email protected]/
* x86: memcpy() / memset() (non-)ERMS flavors plus (v3)
- Jan Beulich
-https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/[email protected]/
Isn't this the same as ...
* x86/spec-ctrl: IBPB improvements (v4)
- Jan Beulich
-https://patchew.org/Xen/[email protected]/
* Move some boot code from assembly to C (v2)
- Frediano Ziglio
-https://patchew.org/Xen/[email protected]/
* Hyperlaunch device tree for dom0 (v1)
- Daniel P. Smith
-https://patchew.org/Xen/[email protected]/
* x86: memcpy() / memset() (non-)ERMS flavors plus fallout (v3)
- Jan Beulich
-https://patchew.org/Xen/[email protected]/
... this?
This is the same and one of them I will drop for the next report.
* amd-pstate CPU Performance Scaling Driver (v1)
- Penny Zheng
-https://patchew.org/Xen/[email protected]/
This series was posted only this week, and upon asking it was clarified that
it's indeed not aiming at 4.20.
Yes, it is definitely not for the current one release. Probably it would
make sense to add the extra line information
that it is for the next one release.
~ Oleksii
