On 16.08.2024 20:25, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > xen.biterg.io was created by a company called Bitergia. Bitergia was > later contracted by the Linux Foundation to create a generic dashboard > for all their Open Source projects. Getting access to the Linux > Foundation dashboard is the best way to go (if it comes to no cost to > our project). > > I have used scripts like these in the past to get some data out of a > release. You can copy/paste the output to an Excel datasheet to do > further calculations there. > > # List of contributors by name (using the commit "Author" tag) for the > # 4.19 release. One name per commit. > git log 4.18.0-rc4...4.19.0-rc4 --format='%aN' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn > > # List of reviewers (using the Reviewed-by and Acked-by tags) for the > # 4.19 release. One name per review. > git log 4.18.0-rc4...4.19.0-rc4 --pretty=format:%b | grep -E > "Reviewed-by|Acked-by" | sed -E > 's/.*(Reviewed-by|Acked-by):\s*(.*)\s*<.*/\2/' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn
Just to mention it: Going by tags here doesn't come anywhere close to the actual work put into reviewing, even when leaving aside the obvious difference between small, large but mechanical, and large+intrusive changes. Imo unlike commit stats, review stats would better be collected from the mailing list. Jan
