On 2024-04-18 17:15, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 18.04.2024 17:00, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
On 2024-04-18 09:22, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 17.04.2024 16:51, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
--- a/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/toolchain.ecl
+++ b/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/toolchain.ecl
@@ -44,8 +44,8 @@
-doc_end
-doc_begin="See Section \"6.19 Structures with No Members\" of
"GCC_MANUAL"."
--config=STD.emptrecd,behavior+={c99,GCC_ARM64,specified}
--config=STD.emptrecd,behavior+={c99,GCC_X86_64,specified}
+-config=STD.anonstct,behavior+={c99,GCC_ARM64,specified}
+-config=STD.anonstct,behavior+={c99,GCC_X86_64,specified}
-doc_end
I'm irritated by this, which may be in part because of too terse a
description.
"emptrecd" looks like an abbreviation of "empty record" to me, in
line
with
"Structures with No Members". "anonstct" otoh looks an abbreviation
of
"anonymous structures" to me, which is something different
(structures
without
names).
I'm afraid I can't do much about this. From a functionality standpoint
there is no difference for Xen.
What I'm pretty sure you can do is provide a patch description that
allows readers to understand anything seemingly (or actually)
anomalous.
Jan
Ok
--
Nicola Vetrini, BSc
Software Engineer, BUGSENG srl (https://bugseng.com)
