On 23.02.2024 13:06, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/spec_ctrl.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/spec_ctrl.c
> @@ -239,6 +239,7 @@ static int __init cf_check parse_spec_ctrl(const char *s)
> /* Xen's speculative sidechannel mitigation settings. */
> else if ( !strncmp(s, "bti-thunk=", 10) )
> {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_INDIRECT_THUNK
> s += 10;
>
> if ( !cmdline_strcmp(s, "retpoline") )
if ( !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INDIRECT_THUNK) )
{
no_config_param("INDIRECT_THUNK", "spec-ctrl", s, ss);
rc = -EINVAL;
}
else if ( !cmdline_strcmp(s, "retpoline") )
?
Also, while touching INDIRECT_THUNK, could I talk you into also adjusting
documentation accordingly? It presently mentions INDIRECT_THUNK, when
really it means CONFIG_INDIRECT_THUNK.
Jan
> @@ -249,6 +250,10 @@ static int __init cf_check parse_spec_ctrl(const char *s)
> opt_thunk = THUNK_JMP;
> else
> rc = -EINVAL;
> +#else
> + no_config_param("INDIRECT_THUNK", "spec-ctrl", s, ss);
> + rc = -EINVAL;
> +#endif
> }
>
> /* Bits in MSR_SPEC_CTRL. */