On 10.02.2024 02:00, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > Update docs/misra/rules.rst to reflect the MISRA C rules accepted in the > last couple of months. > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <[email protected]> > --- > > In the notes section I added some info about the deviations, but in any > case the appropriate info will also be added to deviations.rst, > safe.json, etc. > > I also added Rule 14.4, which is older, but when I first tried to add it > to rules.rst, Jan had a question I couldn't reply clearly: > https://marc.info/?l=xen-devel&m=169828285627163 > > I think now with this series, the impact of Rule 14.4 is clearer: > https://marc.info/?l=xen-devel&m=170194257326186
This series is about enums only afaics. Yet the rule is much wider, and iirc we had agreed that for integer and pointer types the normal language conversion to boolean meaning is fine as well. Not only do you not mention this case in the entry, but it also continue to mean that effectively we limit the rule to a very narrow case. Which continue to leave open the question of whether the rule is worthwhile to accept in the first place. Jan
