On 05.12.2023 14:46, Julien Grall wrote: > On 05/12/2023 13:41, Juergen Gross wrote: >> On 05.12.23 14:31, Julien Grall wrote: >>> Anyway, given you don't seem to have a use-case yet, I would simply to >>> consider to surround the declaration with an a config which can be >>> selected if unaligned access is supported. >> >> Like in xen/common/lzo.c et al? > > Just to clarify, I am suggesting to add in unaligned.h: > > #ifdef CONFIG_HAS_UNALIGNED_ACCESS > > your definitions > > #endif
But that would be wrong: HAS_UNALIGNED_ACCESS would be there to indicate one does _not_ need any special accessors. Jan
