When receiving an INIT, a prior bugfix tried to ignore the INIT and continue
onwards.

Unfortunately it's not safe to return at that point in vmx_vmexit_handler().
Just out of context in the first hunk is a local_irqs_enabled() which is
depended-upon by the return-to-guest path, causing the following checklock
failure in debug builds:

  (XEN) Error: INIT received - ignoring
  (XEN) CHECKLOCK FAILURE: prev irqsafe: 0, curr irqsafe 1
  (XEN) Xen BUG at common/spinlock.c:132
  (XEN) ----[ Xen-4.19-unstable  x86_64  debug=y  Tainted:     H  ]----
  ...
  (XEN) Xen call trace:
  (XEN)    [<ffff82d040238e10>] R check_lock+0xcd/0xe1
  (XEN)    [<ffff82d040238fe3>] F _spin_lock+0x1b/0x60
  (XEN)    [<ffff82d0402ed6a8>] F pt_update_irq+0x32/0x3bb
  (XEN)    [<ffff82d0402b9632>] F vmx_intr_assist+0x3b/0x51d
  (XEN)    [<ffff82d040206447>] F vmx_asm_vmexit_handler+0xf7/0x210

Luckily, this is benign in release builds.  Accidentally having IRQs disabled
when trying to take an IRQs-on lock isn't a deadlock-vulnerable pattern.

Move the INIT handling into the main switch statement.  In hindsight, it's
wrong to skip other normal VMExit steps.

Fixes: b1f11273d5a7 ("x86/vmx: Don't spuriously crash the domain when INIT is 
received")
Reported-by: Reima ISHII <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <[email protected]>
---
CC: Jan Beulich <[email protected]>
CC: Roger Pau MonnĂ© <[email protected]>
CC: Wei Liu <[email protected]>
CC: Jun Nakajima <[email protected]>
CC: Kevin Tian <[email protected]>
CC: Tamas K Lengyel <[email protected]>
CC: Reima ISHII <[email protected]>
CC: Takahiro Shinagawa <[email protected]>

With this patch in place, the INIT is ignored and the guest continues:

  (XEN) HVM1 restore: CPU 0
  (d1) --- Xen Test Framework ---
  (d1) Environment: HVM 64bit (Long mode 4 levels)
  (XEN) Error: INIT received - ignoring
  (d1) Test result: SUCCESS
---
 xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c | 10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
index 1edc7f1e919f..d26920d03bbc 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -4097,10 +4097,6 @@ void vmx_vmexit_handler(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
     case EXIT_REASON_MCE_DURING_VMENTRY:
         do_machine_check(regs);
         break;
-
-    case EXIT_REASON_INIT:
-        printk(XENLOG_ERR "Error: INIT received - ignoring\n");
-        return; /* Renter the guest without further processing */
     }
 
     /* Now enable interrupts so it's safe to take locks. */
@@ -4390,6 +4386,12 @@ void vmx_vmexit_handler(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
     case EXIT_REASON_TRIPLE_FAULT:
         hvm_triple_fault();
         break;
+
+    case EXIT_REASON_INIT:
+        /* TODO: Turn into graceful shutdown. */
+        printk(XENLOG_ERR "Error: INIT received - ignoring\n");
+        break;
+
     case EXIT_REASON_PENDING_VIRT_INTR:
         /* Disable the interrupt window. */
         v->arch.hvm.vmx.exec_control &= ~CPU_BASED_VIRTUAL_INTR_PENDING;
-- 
2.30.2


Reply via email to