On 19.10.2023 02:07, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Tue, 17 Oct 2023, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> Jan, for this specific patch, I don't think we have the scan including >>> Intel vmx files yet. Nicola please correct me if I am wrong. So Nicola >>> wouldn't be able to easily expand this patch to also cover Intel vmx >>> violations of this rule because we don't have the list of violations >>> affecting those files. >> >> I'm afraid I disagree: There are likely direct VMX counterparts to the SVM >> items adjusted. No scan is needed to spot those. Anything VMX-only can be >> left separate, sure. > > Nicola is new to the codebase, so let us help. > > This patch adds deviations for these SVM functions: > - svm_intr_assist > - nsvm_vcpu_switch > - svm_vmenter_helper > - svm_vmexit_handler > > I take these are the VMX equivalents: > - vmx_intr_assist > - nvmx_switch_guest > - vmx_vmenter_helper > - vmx_asm_vmexit_handler > > Jan, did I miss anything?
At the first glance - no, I don't think you do. Jan
