On Thu, 2023-09-14 at 17:08 +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 14.09.2023 16:56, Oleksii Kurochko wrote: > > Based on two patch series [1] and [2], the idea of which is to > > provide minimal > > amount of things for a complete Xen build, a large amount of > > headers are the same > > or almost the same, so it makes sense to move them to asm-generic. > > > > Also, providing such stub headers should help future architectures > > to add > > a full Xen build. > > > > [1] > > https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/[email protected]/ > > [2] > > https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/[email protected]/ > > > > Oleksii Kurochko (29): > > xen/asm-generic: introduce stub header spinlock.h > > At the example of this, personally I think this goes too far. Headers > in > asm-generic should be for the case where an arch elects to not > implement > certain functionality. Clearly spinlocks are required uniformly. It makes sense. Then I will back to the option [2] where I introduced all this headers as part of RISC-V architecture.
~ Oleksii
