On 18.07.2023 15:23, Simon Gaiser wrote:
> ---
>  xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpu_idle.c | 9 ++++++---
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

This lacks both S-o-b and a proper description. The latter in
particular because you ...

> --- a/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpu_idle.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpu_idle.c
> @@ -155,6 +155,12 @@ static void cf_check do_get_hw_residencies(void *arg)
>  
>      switch ( c->x86_model )
>      {
> +    /* Tiger Lake */
> +    case 0x8C:
> +    case 0x8D:
> +    /* Alder Lake */
> +    case 0x97:
> +    case 0x9A:
>      /* 4th generation Intel Core (Haswell) */
>      case 0x45:
>          GET_PC8_RES(hw_res->pc8);
> @@ -185,9 +191,6 @@ static void cf_check do_get_hw_residencies(void *arg)
>      case 0x6C:
>      case 0x7D:
>      case 0x7E:
> -    /* Tiger Lake */
> -    case 0x8C:
> -    case 0x8D:
>      /* Kaby Lake */
>      case 0x8E:
>      case 0x9E:

... don't just add new case labels, but you actually move two. It
wants explaining whether this was outright wrong, or what else
causes the movement.

Jan

Reply via email to