On 05.07.2023 16:13, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 29/06/2023 4:26 pm, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/microcode/core.c 
>> b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/microcode/core.c
>> index bec8b55db2..b620e3bfa6 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/microcode/core.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/microcode/core.c
>> @@ -867,10 +867,22 @@ int __init early_microcode_init(unsigned long 
>> *module_map,
>>          return -ENODEV;
>>      }
>>  
>> -    microcode_grab_module(module_map, mbi);
>> -
>>      ucode_ops.collect_cpu_info();
>>  
>> +    /*
>> +     * Some hypervisors deliberately report a microcode revision of -1 to
>> +     * mean that they will not accept microcode updates. We take the hint
>> +     * and ignore the microcode interface in that case.
>> +     */
>> +    if ( this_cpu(cpu_sig).rev == ~0 )
>> +    {
>> +        printk(XENLOG_WARNING "Microcode loading disabled\n");
> 
> XENLOG_INFO "Found microcode revision ~0;  Disabling loading because of
> virt\n"
> 
> It's normal (and not a warning) when running under other hypervisors,

Except that INFO won't be visible by default in release configurations.

Jan

> and just "loading disabled" is too little information.
> 
> Happy to fix on commit.  Everything else looks ok.
> 
> ~Andrew


Reply via email to