On 27.02.2023 16:57, Jan Beulich wrote: > Well, I'm not outright opposed. But I definitely want to hear another > maintainer's view before deciding.
Oh, and I should have added: If to be taken, the description would need extending to explain why the simple route is taken here, and why it is deemed okay to consider crypto for as little or as much as is, in the eventual final version, going to be covered in the final version (i.e. in the version as submitted it would want clarifying why it is okay to include for Arm despite being unused there). Jan
