On 14.12.2022 10:34, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 14.12.2022 00:03, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: >> This was missed in the initial patchset. >> >> Signed-off-by: Demi Marie Obenour <[email protected]> > > I'm sorry, but no: In a v2 submission you should address prior comments. > On v1 I did offer to extend the description while committing, but you > should not take this as an invitation to make the committer again put > more time into getting this into the tree than should actually be needed > (and reviewers to re-figure the unmentioned aspect).
So I thought I'd be kind and do what I said I didn't really want to do, but things are worse: The patch again doesn't apply, this time because of assuming an apparently private patch of yours to also be in place. As it's merely patch context which is a problem, I'll edit the patch, but only to be done with it rather than wasting yet more time. Jan
