On 01.12.2022 17:02, Rahul Singh wrote:
> Add new viommu_type field and field values XEN_DOMCTL_CONFIG_VIOMMU_NONE
> XEN_DOMCTL_CONFIG_VIOMMU_SMMUV3 in xen_arch_domainconfig to
> enable/disable vIOMMU support for domains.
> 
> Also add viommu="N" parameter to xl domain configuration to enable the
> vIOMMU for the domains. Currently, only the "smmuv3" type is supported
> for ARM.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rahul Singh <[email protected]>
> ---
>  docs/man/xl.cfg.5.pod.in             | 11 +++++++++++
>  tools/golang/xenlight/helpers.gen.go |  2 ++
>  tools/golang/xenlight/types.gen.go   |  1 +
>  tools/include/libxl.h                |  5 +++++
>  tools/libs/light/libxl_arm.c         | 13 +++++++++++++
>  tools/libs/light/libxl_types.idl     |  6 ++++++
>  tools/xl/xl_parse.c                  |  9 +++++++++
>  7 files changed, 47 insertions(+)

This diffstat taken together with the title makes me assume that e.g. ...

> --- a/tools/libs/light/libxl_arm.c
> +++ b/tools/libs/light/libxl_arm.c
> @@ -179,6 +179,19 @@ int libxl__arch_domain_prepare_config(libxl__gc *gc,
>          return ERROR_FAIL;
>      }
>  
> +    switch (d_config->b_info.arch_arm.viommu_type) {
> +    case LIBXL_VIOMMU_TYPE_NONE:
> +        config->arch.viommu_type = XEN_DOMCTL_CONFIG_VIOMMU_NONE;

... this constant doesn't exist yet, and hence this would fail to build
at this point in the series. I notice, however, that the constants are
introduced in earlier patches. Perhaps the title here wants re-wording?

Jan

Reply via email to