> On 7 Nov 2022, at 11:49, Jan Beulich <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 07.11.2022 11:47, Luca Fancellu wrote:
>> --- a/xen/include/xen/kernel.h
>> +++ b/xen/include/xen/kernel.h
>> @@ -65,24 +65,28 @@
>> 1; \
>> })
>>
>> +/* SAF-0-safe R8.6 linker script defined symbols */
>> extern char _start[], _end[], start[];
>> #define is_kernel(p) ({ \
>> char *__p = (char *)(unsigned long)(p); \
>> (__p >= _start) && (__p < _end); \
>> })
>>
>> +/* SAF-0-safe R8.6 linker script defined symbols */
>> extern char _stext[], _etext[];
>> #define is_kernel_text(p) ({ \
>> char *__p = (char *)(unsigned long)(p); \
>> (__p >= _stext) && (__p < _etext); \
>> })
>>
>> +/* SAF-0-safe R8.6 linker script defined symbols */
>> extern const char _srodata[], _erodata[];
>> #define is_kernel_rodata(p) ({ \
>> const char *__p = (const char *)(unsigned long)(p); \
>> (__p >= _srodata) && (__p < _erodata); \
>> })
>>
>> +/* SAF-0-safe R8.6 linker script defined symbols */
>> extern char _sinittext[], _einittext[];
>> #define is_kernel_inittext(p) ({ \
>> char *__p = (char *)(unsigned long)(p); \
>
Hi Jan,
> Why the "R8.6" everywhere here? Didn't we agree that the in-code
> comments should be tool-agnostic?
The R8.6 is not tool specific, it is to give the quick hint that we are
deviating
from MISRA Rule 8.6.
>
> Jan
