Hi Xenia,

> On 29 Jul 2022, at 07:31, Xenia Ragiadakou <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Jan,
> 
> On 7/29/22 09:26, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 28.07.2022 18:21, Xenia Ragiadakou wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/domain.c
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain.c
>>> @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static void do_idle(void)
>>>      rcu_idle_exit(cpu);
>>>  }
>>>  -void idle_loop(void)
>>> +static void idle_loop(void)
>> While you're adding "noreturn" below, shouldn't this one be marked so
>> as well? Preferably with the addition:
>> Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <[email protected]>
> 
> Yes, but I was not sure if this should go in this patch or in a separate one.

As you modify the function to make it static, I think it is ok to also add the 
noreturn in the same patch.

With that done, you can add my:
Reviewed-by: Bertrand Marquis <[email protected]>

Cheers
Bertrand
> 
> -- 
> Xenia


Reply via email to