Hi Stefano,
> On 3 Jun 2022, at 02:45, Stefano Stabellini <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 31 May 2022, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
>> Complete AA64ISAR2 and AA64MMFR[0-1] with more fields.
>> While there add a comment for MMFR bitfields as for other registers in
>> the cpuinfo structure definition.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bertrand Marquis <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> Changes in v2:
>> - patch introduced to isolate changes in cpufeature.h
>> - complete MMFR0 and ISAR2 to sync with sysregs.h status
>> ---
>> xen/arch/arm/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/cpufeature.h
>> b/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/cpufeature.h
>> index 9649a7afee..57eb6773d3 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/cpufeature.h
>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/cpufeature.h
>> @@ -234,6 +234,7 @@ struct cpuinfo_arm {
>> union {
>> register_t bits[3];
>> struct {
>> + /* MMFR0 */
>> unsigned long pa_range:4;
>> unsigned long asid_bits:4;
>> unsigned long bigend:4;
>> @@ -242,18 +243,31 @@ struct cpuinfo_arm {
>> unsigned long tgranule_16K:4;
>> unsigned long tgranule_64K:4;
>> unsigned long tgranule_4K:4;
>> - unsigned long __res0:32;
>> -
>> + unsigned long tgranule_16k_2:4;
>> + unsigned long tgranule_64k_2:4;
>> + unsigned long tgranule_4k:4;
>
> Should be tgranule_4k_2:4
Right I will fix that.
>
>
>> + unsigned long exs:4;
>> + unsigned long __res0:8;
>> + unsigned long fgt:4;
>> + unsigned long ecv:4;
>> +
>> + /* MMFR1 */
>> unsigned long hafdbs:4;
>> unsigned long vmid_bits:4;
>> unsigned long vh:4;
>> unsigned long hpds:4;
>> unsigned long lo:4;
>> unsigned long pan:4;
>> - unsigned long __res1:8;
>> - unsigned long __res2:28;
>> + unsigned long specsei:4;
>> + unsigned long xnx:4;
>> + unsigned long twed:4;
>> + unsigned long ets:4;
>> + unsigned long __res1:4;
>
> hcx?
>
>
>> + unsigned long afp:4;
>> + unsigned long __res2:12;
>
> ntlbpa
> tidcp1
> cmow
>
>> unsigned long ecbhb:4;
>
> Strangely enough I am looking at DDI0487H and ecbhb is not there
> (D13.2.65). Am I looking at the wrong location?
Right now I declared here only the values which have a corresponding
declaration in sysregs.h
If I add more fields here we will not be in sync with it anymore.
And on ecbhb it will be in the next revision of the manual yes.
>
>
>> + /* MMFR2 */
>> unsigned long __res3:64;
>> };
>> } mm64;
>> @@ -297,7 +311,11 @@ struct cpuinfo_arm {
>> unsigned long __res2:8;
>>
>> /* ISAR2 */
>> - unsigned long __res3:28;
>> + unsigned long wfxt:4;
>> + unsigned long rpres:4;
>> + unsigned long gpa3:4;
>> + unsigned long apa3:4;
>> + unsigned long __res3:12;
>
> mops
> bc
> pac_frac
>
>
>> unsigned long clearbhb:4;
>
> And again this is not described at D13.2.63. Probably the bhb stuff
> didn't make it into the ARM ARM yet.
As said before, are you ok with only adding stuff declared in sysregs
to make it simpler to sync with Linux ?
Cheers
Bertrand
>
>
>>
>> unsigned long __res4:32;
>> --
>> 2.25.1
