On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 10:25:31AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> In TDT mode there's no point writing TDCR or TMICT, while outside of
> that mode there's no need for the MFENCE.
>
> No change intended to overall functioning.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <[email protected]>
I've got some comments below, now that the current proposal is bad,
but I think we could simplify a bit more.
> ---
> v2: New.
>
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/apic.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/apic.c
> @@ -1059,24 +1059,25 @@ static void __setup_APIC_LVTT(unsigned i
> {
> unsigned int lvtt_value, tmp_value;
>
> - /* NB. Xen uses local APIC timer in one-shot mode. */
> - lvtt_value = /*APIC_TIMER_MODE_PERIODIC |*/ LOCAL_TIMER_VECTOR;
> -
> if ( tdt_enabled )
> {
> - lvtt_value &= (~APIC_TIMER_MODE_MASK);
> - lvtt_value |= APIC_TIMER_MODE_TSC_DEADLINE;
> + lvtt_value = APIC_TIMER_MODE_TSC_DEADLINE | LOCAL_TIMER_VECTOR;
> + apic_write(APIC_LVTT, lvtt_value);
> +
> + /*
> + * See Intel SDM: TSC-Deadline Mode chapter. In xAPIC mode,
> + * writing to the APIC LVTT and TSC_DEADLINE MSR isn't serialized.
> + * According to Intel, MFENCE can do the serialization here.
> + */
> + asm volatile( "mfence" : : : "memory" );
> +
> + return;
> }
>
> + /* NB. Xen uses local APIC timer in one-shot mode. */
> + lvtt_value = /*APIC_TIMER_MODE_PERIODIC |*/ LOCAL_TIMER_VECTOR;
While here I wouldn't mind if you replaced the comment(s) here with
APIC_TIMER_MODE_ONESHOT. I think that's clearer.
I wouldn't mind if you did something like:
unsigned int lvtt_value = (tdt_enabled ? APIC_TIMER_MODE_TSC_DEADLINE
: APIC_TIMER_MODE_ONESHOT) |
LOCAL_TIMER_VECTOR;
apic_write(APIC_LVTT, lvtt_value);
if ( tdt_enabled )
{
MFENCE;
return;
}
Thanks, Roger.