Hi Jan,
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 10:41:30AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 14.12.2021 10:34, Oleksii Moisieiev wrote:
> > --- a/xen/include/public/domctl.h
> > +++ b/xen/include/public/domctl.h
> > @@ -1177,6 +1177,13 @@ struct xen_domctl_vmtrace_op {
> > #define XEN_DOMCTL_vmtrace_get_option 5
> > #define XEN_DOMCTL_vmtrace_set_option 6
> > };
> > +
> > +/* XEN_DOMCTL_add_sci_device: set sci device permissions */
> > +struct xen_domctl_sci_device_op {
> > + uint32_t size; /* Length of the path */
> > + XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_64(char) path; /* path to the device tree node */
> > +};
>
> This being - aiui - Arm-only, please enclose it by respective #if,
> just like we do for certain x86-only ops.
>
I agree. I will add #ifdefs in v2.
> I'm further afraid the term "SCI" is ambiguous with ACPI's System
> Control Interrupt, so there's some further tag needed in the names
> used here.
>
Thank you for remark. I'm thinking about SC as System Control.
What do you think?
> Finally please make padding explicit and check that it's zero on
> input.
>
I will align the comments in functions and structures in v2.
Best regards,
Oleksii.