Hi Jan,
Thanks for reviewing the patches.
Yeah, I messed it up while breaking the code into multiple patches. For next v3 
patch series, I will move the function call "handle_add_overlay_nodes()"(in 
patch 8/12) to 9/12 patch.

Thanks,
Vikram
________________________________
From: Jan Beulich <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 9, 2021 3:19 AM
To: Vikram Garhwal <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] 
<[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; 
[email protected] <[email protected]>; Andrew Cooper 
<[email protected]>; George Dunlap <[email protected]>; Ian 
Jackson <[email protected]>; Wei Liu <[email protected]>; 
[email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [XEN][RFC PATCH v2 09/12] xen/arm: Implement device tree node 
addition functionalities

On 09.11.2021 08:02, Vikram Garhwal wrote:
> --- a/xen/common/sysctl.c
> +++ b/xen/common/sysctl.c
> @@ -331,6 +331,205 @@ out:
>      spin_unlock(&overlay_lock);
>      return rc;
>  }
> +
> +/*
> + * Adds device tree nodes under target node.
> + * We use dt_host_new to unflatten the updated device_tree_flattened. This is
> + * done to avoid the removal of device_tree generation, iomem regions 
> mapping to
> + * hardware domain done by handle_node().
> + */
> +static long handle_add_overlay_nodes(void *overlay_fdt,
> +                                     uint32_t overlay_fdt_size)

You adding a static function here without any caller got me puzzled.
First I thought you'd be introducing a build failure this was, but
it's really patch 8 which does by introducing a call to this function
without the function actually being there.

Jan

Reply via email to