On 13.10.2021 17:48, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 24.08.2021 12:50, Anthony PERARD wrote: >> I guess it's easier to remember that %.E does "$(CC) -E" or "$(CPP)". > > I've never seen any *.E. I'm puzzled (and hence have reservations, but > then again don't care enough to object).
Actually I've checked gcc, and it wouldn't know what to do with a *.E file. Hence I'd like to ask that you add a reasonable reference to a pre-existing use of this naming. Without such reference I'd feel the addition would have more risk of confusion than possible value. Jan
