[PATCH v2 2/3] VT-d: PCI segments are up to 16 bits wide

[Jan Beulich]

We shouldn't silently truncate respective values.

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>
---
Strictly speaking we shouldn't use uint<N>_t here at all. I wasn't sure
though whether going straight to unsigned int wouldn't be viewed as
introducing inconsistencies.
---
v2: New.

--- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c
+++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c
@@ -1462,7 +1462,8 @@ static int domain_context_mapping(struct
 {
     const struct acpi_drhd_unit *drhd = acpi_find_matched_drhd_unit(pdev);
     int ret = 0;
-    u8 seg = pdev->seg, bus = pdev->bus, secbus;
+    uint16_t seg = pdev->seg;
+    uint8_t bus = pdev->bus, secbus;
 
     /*
      * Generally we assume only devices from one node to get assigned to a
@@ -1677,7 +1678,8 @@ static int domain_context_unmap(struct d
     const struct acpi_drhd_unit *drhd = acpi_find_matched_drhd_unit(pdev);
     struct vtd_iommu *iommu = drhd ? drhd->iommu : NULL;
     int ret;
-    u8 seg = pdev->seg, bus = pdev->bus, tmp_bus, tmp_devfn, secbus;
+    uint16_t seg = pdev->seg;
+    uint8_t bus = pdev->bus, tmp_bus, tmp_devfn, secbus;
     bool found;
 
     switch ( pdev->type )