Hi,
On 21/07/2021 10:06, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 21/07/2021 09:21, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Scott,
On 20/07/2021 18:56, Scott Davis wrote:
This adds an option to the xl domain configuration file syntax for
specifying
a kernel command line for device-model stubdomains. It is intended
for use with
Linux-based stubdomains.
May I ask why embedding the command line in the kernel would not be a
solution? Do you expect it to change from stubdom to stubdom?
Why should users of stubdoms be forced to embed command line options?
Especially when its not the normal way of working?
I didn't suggest they should be forced. I was more interested to know
the setup because I was expecting stubdomain to use a very tailored kernel.
They shouldn't, and this alone is enough justification for the change.
Everyone has a different perspective. I don't see the problem of asking
the question... Maybe I should have add "OOI" to make clear with wasn't
a complain.
Cheers,
--
Julien Grall
