On 05/07/2021 08:35, Olaf Hering wrote: > Am Fri, 2 Jul 2021 20:03:34 +0100 > schrieb Andrew Cooper <[email protected]>: > >> Fixes: 34990446ca91 ("libxl: don't ignore the return value from >> xc_cpuid_apply_policy") > I think it fixes 111c8c33a8a18588f3da3c5dbb7f5c63ddb98ce5 ("x86/cpuid: do not > expand max leaves on restore"), 34990446ca91 just revealed the bug?
Urgh... That's what I intended to write here. I'll fix up. > Either way, this new variant is what I had tested last week. But with a > trailing "u" for the constant. This detail may not make a difference in > practice. The trailing u doesn't matter in this case. Furthermore, the way min() is written, the compiler will object if it were to be wrong. ~Andrew
