>>> On 14.03.18 at 00:31, <[email protected]> wrote: > + * For x86 implementations at least, the values used in the type field will > + * match the Address Range Types as defined in section 15 (System Address > + * Map Interfaces) of the ACPI Specification (http://uefi.org/specifications) > + * where: > + * AddressRangeMemory = 1 (E820_RAM) > + * AddressRangeReserved = 2 (E820_RESERVED) > + * AddressRangeACPI = 3 (E820_ACPI) > + * AddressRangeNVS = 4 (E820_NVS) > + * AddressRangeUnusable = 5 (E820_UNUSABLE) > + * AddressRangeDisabled = 6 (E820_DISABLED) > + * AddressRangePersistentMemory = 7 (E820_PMEM)
Would you mind waiting for a discussion to settle before sending out new patch versions? As indicated in an earlier reply to v1, I consider this still insufficient. And no, I'm not asking for you to add redundant and potentially conflicting definitions of E820_*, but instead you want to use Xen specific ones (prefixed e.g. by XEN_HVM_MEMMAP_TYPE_). Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
