Thanks, George! This includes part of Intel features. Chao is working on a complete list of patch series and their status for all Intel features.
Best Regards John Ji -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of George Dunlap Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2018 12:01 AM To: Lars Kurth <[email protected]> Cc: xen-devel <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Juergen Gross <[email protected]>; Janakarajan Natarajan <[email protected]>; Tamas K Lengyel <[email protected]>; Wei Liu <[email protected]>; Andrew Cooper <[email protected]>; Daniel Kiper <[email protected]>; Roger Pau Monné <[email protected]>; Christopher Clark <[email protected]>; Ji, John <[email protected]>; Rich Persaud <[email protected]>; Paul Durrant <[email protected]>; Jan Beulich' <[email protected]>; Brian Woods <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] X86 Community Call: Wed March 14, 15:00 - 16:00 UTC On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 4:26 PM, Lars Kurth <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 07/03/2018, 17:02, "George Dunlap" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> * Title of series > >> > >> * Link to series (e.g. on > https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel, > >> markmail, …) > >> > >> * Number of outstanding ACKs (and by whom), number of ACKs > > > >I assume you're suggesting that individuals should reply to this email > >with that information? And that to begin with you'll be acting as > >secretary to keep track of it? > > Correct. > > Although it is also OK for someone within an organization to do that on > behalf of several developers within that organisation. > > I will also chair the meeting and write up high-level notes. But for deeply > technical discussions, which requires detail: I would prefer if someone else > wrote notes for the section and sent them to me afterwards, or replied to the > notes I would send out. OK, well here are some series I have lurking around my inbox that I think coordination might need doing for: * Intel EPT-Based Sub-page Write Protection Support. marc.info/?i=<[email protected]> RFC posted by Zhang Yi Oct 19, 2017; No acks, reviews only by memaccess maintainers / developers. * Virtual VT-d (vIOMMU) marc.info/?i=<[email protected]> v3 posted by Lan Tianyu on 22 September 2017. Seems to have had review by Roger Pau Monne (not counted acks). * Extend resources to support more vcpus in single VM marc.info/?i=<[email protected]> RFC posted by Lan Tianyu on 13 September 2017. I have an idea this may have been reposted but I dont' thave that link to hand. * Add guest CPU topology support marc.info/?i=<[email protected]> RFC posted by Chao Gao on 1 January 2018. Some feedback from Andrew Cooper. * Intel Processor Trace virtulization enabling marc.info/?i=<[email protected]> v1.1 Posted by Lan Tianyu on 15 January 2018. No feedback. * x86: guest resource mapping marc.info/?i=<[email protected]> v17 posted by Paul Durrant on 3 January 2018. Seems to have a fair amount of R-b's, but still more feedback. * paravirtual IOMMU interface marc.info/?i=<[email protected]> v1 posted by Paul Durrant on 12 Feb 2018. Seems to have had a lot of feedback from Kevin Tian. * Add vNVDIMM support to HVM domains marc.info/?i=<[email protected]> RFC posted by Haozhong Zhang on 7 December 2017. A few messages about the overall architecture; some more detailed comments by Anthony on the integration with the toolstack. * x86: emulator enhancements marc.info/?i=<[email protected]> v4 posted by Jan Beulich on 28 Feb 2018. Most patches seem to have acks or r-bs, but I know this one has been around a long time, so it might be worth making sure we can get it in before the feature freeze. -George _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
