On 01/10/2018 06:50 AM, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 09/01/18 23:11, Hans van Kranenburg wrote: >> On 01/09/2018 07:22 PM, Rich Persaud wrote: >>> >> >>> Since the primary audience for security fixes are production >>> deployments of Xen where customer assets are at risk, is there an >>> estimate for the percentage/size of Xen deployments where PVH (not >>> only Xen 4.10) has already been deployed for production customers? >>> That could give other customers more confidence in deploying PVH in >>> production. >> +1 >> >> I have been hearing mostly-very-positive stories around, except for the >> missing pvgrub2 support. :) > > https://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2017-11/msg01795.html
Ah thanks. I also found the links to kernel changes and a xen change. http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2017-12/msg00002.html I'm going to play around with it, see if I can get it running. Being able to use pvgrub2 will mean ending up with an incredibly smooth migration path to Xen 4.10 and PVHv2... Hans _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
