On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 06:14:49PM -0400, Elsie Hupp wrote: > > I find it intriguing that you insult people > > right back by calling an *extremely* common convention in technical > > mailing lists, a "dusty cultural artifact" and suggesting that it is > > malicious behavior. > > I’ve been using email for 25+ years. (I have people twice my age and people > half my age find my technical generation incomprehensible.) Blockquotes have > always been annoying and awful, but they had stopped being a constant thorn > in my side until I joined this mailing list. They don’t even seem to be a > problem on other mailman mailing lists I’m on. > > > a “dusty cultural artifact” > > Yes, this is a thing called “shade”. > > > I am sure we are all delighted to know that disagreeing over mailing > > list etiquette "with intent to make smartphones do worse rendering of > > the messages" is the point at which you believe it is necessary to > > summon the code of conduct committee in order to report > > passive-aggressive condescension. > > Oh, the problem was that that *dude* ... > > I CC’d the conduct committee
So did I just now. How is *your* behaviour compliant with said CoC?! All of a sudden the gloves came of it seems. How is it OK to call anyone "that dude"? Do you think I cannot read this or contact the CoC committee about it? > This was the third or fourth response where he had been lecturing me > personally over nothing at all. When did I lecture you?! I gave you *one* hint and you come back with *that* attitude? From now on I will simply ignore you, but I very much demand action from the CoC team regarding *your* conduct!
