Is there something else we can do to ask the system to keep XDG_RUNTIME_DIR around? Or should any application which might be run in nohup/screen just not rely on XDG_RUNTIME_DIR?
Thomas On Thu, May 10, 2018, at 4:08 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Do, 10.05.18 15:27, Thomas Kluyver ([email protected]) wrote: > > > Thanks Lennart. Would it make sense for our application code to open > > a Pam session in this scenario so it counts as a login? Sorry if > > this is a silly question: I know ~nothing about how logins work. > > PAM sessions are generally something only privileged code can > register, hence, no not really... > > Lennart > > -- > Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ xdg mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
