xdg  

Messages by Date

• 2014/01/19 defaults.list or mimeapps.list? Jerome Leclanche
• 2014/01/18 expanding the inhibit spec Michal Suchanek
• 2014/01/17 HELP bugzilla LIBREOFFICE PROBLEM Gianni Nardoia
• 2014/01/16 [PREVIEW] python-xdg: shared-mimeinfo/trash/mime-actions/desktop-entry specs in python. Compatible with intents. Jerome Leclanche
• 2014/01/15 Re: Extending xdg-user-dirs Dominique Michel
• 2014/01/15 Re: Extending xdg-user-dirs Dominique Michel
• 2014/01/15 Re: Extending xdg-user-dirs David Nečas
• 2014/01/15 Re: Extending xdg-user-dirs Cosimo Cecchi
• 2014/01/15 Re: Extending xdg-user-dirs Jerome Leclanche
• 2014/01/15 Re: Extending xdg-user-dirs Alexandre Franke
• 2014/01/15 Extending xdg-user-dirs Cosimo Cecchi
• 2014/01/15 Supporting desktop actions in actions cache/actions list files. Syntax RFC Jerome Leclanche
• 2014/01/13 Re: Modifying an existing desktop file's MimeTypes David Faure
• 2014/01/13 Re: Modifying an existing desktop file's MimeTypes Jerome Leclanche
• 2014/01/13 Re: Modifying an existing desktop file's MimeTypes Bastien Nocera
• 2014/01/12 Re: systemd and cgroups Jasper St. Pierre
• 2014/01/12 systemd and cgroups Dominique Michel
• 2014/01/12 Re: expanding the inhibit spec Àlex Fiestas
• 2014/01/11 Re: Modifying an existing desktop file's MimeTypes Albert Astals Cid
• 2014/01/11 Re: expanding the inhibit spec Oswald Buddenhagen
• 2014/01/10 Modifying an existing desktop file's MimeTypes Jerome Leclanche
• 2014/01/10 Re: expanding the inhibit spec Bastien Nocera
• 2014/01/09 Re: expanding the inhibit spec Lennart Poettering
• 2014/01/09 Re: expanding the inhibit spec Lennart Poettering
• 2014/01/09 Re: expanding the inhibit spec Ryan Lortie
• 2014/01/09 Re: expanding the inhibit spec Ryan Lortie
• 2014/01/09 Re: expanding the inhibit spec Bastien Nocera
• 2014/01/09 Re: expanding the inhibit spec Lennart Poettering
• 2014/01/09 Re: expanding the inhibit spec Lennart Poettering
• 2014/01/09 Re: expanding the inhibit spec Lennart Poettering
• 2014/01/09 Icon Naming Specification Côme BERNIGAUD
• 2014/01/08 Re: More about "intents": Several improvements to desktop files and caches Dominique Michel
• 2014/01/08 Re: More about "intents": Several improvements to desktop files and caches Dominique Michel
• 2014/01/08 Re: More about "intents": Several improvements to desktop files and caches Simon McVittie
• 2014/01/08 Re: More about "intents": Several improvements to desktop files and caches Jerome Leclanche
• 2014/01/08 Re: More about "intents": Several improvements to desktop files and caches Dominique Michel
• 2014/01/08 Re: More about "intents": Several improvements to desktop files and caches Dominique Michel
• 2014/01/08 Re: expanding the inhibit spec Ryan Lortie
• 2014/01/08 Re: expanding the inhibit spec Ryan Lortie
• 2014/01/08 Re: expanding the inhibit spec Ryan Lortie
• 2014/01/08 Re: More about "intents": Several improvements to desktop files and caches Simon McVittie
• 2014/01/08 Re: expanding the inhibit spec Bastien Nocera
• 2014/01/08 Re: More about "intents": Several improvements to desktop files and caches Dominique Michel
• 2014/01/08 Re: expanding the inhibit spec Simon McVittie
• 2014/01/08 Re: expanding the inhibit spec Lennart Poettering
• 2014/01/08 Re: expanding the inhibit spec Lennart Poettering
• 2014/01/07 Re: expanding the inhibit spec Ryan Lortie
• 2014/01/07 Re: expanding the inhibit spec Ryan Lortie
• 2014/01/07 Menu spec: Rewording "Core" category Jerome Leclanche
• 2014/01/07 Re: expanding the inhibit spec Ted Gould
• 2014/01/07 Re: expanding the inhibit spec Ryan Lortie
• 2014/01/07 Re: expanding the inhibit spec Ryan Lortie
• 2014/01/07 Re: expanding the inhibit spec Jasper St. Pierre
• 2014/01/07 Re: More about "intents": Several improvements to desktop files and caches Jerome Leclanche
• 2014/01/07 Re: expanding the inhibit spec Ted Gould
• 2014/01/07 Re: expanding the inhibit spec Ryan Lortie
• 2014/01/07 Re: expanding the inhibit spec Simon McVittie
• 2014/01/07 expanding the inhibit spec Ryan Lortie
• 2014/01/07 Re: More about "intents": Several improvements to desktop files and caches Jasper St. Pierre
• 2014/01/07 Re: More about "intents": Several improvements to desktop files and caches Jerome Leclanche
• 2014/01/07 Re: Confused by NoDisplay Jasper St. Pierre
• 2014/01/07 Re: Confused by NoDisplay Jasper St. Pierre
• 2014/01/07 Re: More about "intents": Several improvements to desktop files and caches Jasper St. Pierre
• 2014/01/07 Re: More about "intents": Several improvements to desktop files and caches Jerome Leclanche
• 2014/01/07 Re: More about "intents": Several improvements to desktop files and caches Dominique Michel
• 2014/01/07 Re: New handling for URI scheme handlers Bastien Nocera
• 2014/01/07 Confused by NoDisplay Christof Arn
• 2014/01/06 Re: More about "intents": Several improvements to desktop files and caches Kevin Krammer
• 2014/01/06 Re: More about "intents": Several improvements to desktop files and caches Ryan Lortie
• 2014/01/06 Re: More about "intents": Several improvements to desktop files and caches Jasper St. Pierre
• 2014/01/06 Re: More about "intents": Several improvements to desktop files and caches David Faure
• 2014/01/06 Re: More about "intents": Several improvements to desktop files and caches Simon McVittie
• 2014/01/06 Re: More about "intents": Several improvements to desktop files and caches Kevin Krammer
• 2014/01/06 Re: More about "intents": Several improvements to desktop files and caches Jerome Leclanche
• 2014/01/06 Re: More about "intents": Several improvements to desktop files and caches Kevin Krammer
• 2014/01/06 Re: More about "intents": Several improvements to desktop files and caches Jerome Leclanche
• 2014/01/06 Re: More about "intents": Several improvements to desktop files and caches Kevin Krammer
• 2014/01/06 Re: More about "intents": Several improvements to desktop files and caches Bastien Nocera
• 2014/01/06 Re: More about "intents": Several improvements to desktop files and caches David Faure
• 2014/01/06 Re: More about "intents": Several improvements to desktop files and caches Bastien Nocera
• 2014/01/06 Re: More about "intents": Several improvements to desktop files and caches David Faure
• 2014/01/06 Re: More about "intents": Several improvements to desktop files and caches Bastien Nocera
• 2014/01/06 Re: More about "intents": Several improvements to desktop files and caches David Faure
• 2014/01/05 Re: More about "intents": Several improvements to desktop files and caches Ryan Lortie
• 2014/01/05 Re: More about "intents": Several improvements to desktop files and caches Jerome Leclanche
• 2014/01/05 Re: More about "intents": Several improvements to desktop files and caches Ryan Lortie
• 2014/01/05 Re: More about "intents": Several improvements to desktop files and caches Jerome Leclanche
• 2014/01/05 Re: More about "intents": Several improvements to desktop files and caches Ryan Lortie
• 2014/01/05 Re: More about "intents": Several improvements to desktop files and caches Jasper St. Pierre
• 2014/01/05 Re: More about "intents": Several improvements to desktop files and caches Jerome Leclanche
• 2014/01/05 Re: More about "intents": Several improvements to desktop files and caches Ryan Lortie
• 2014/01/05 More about "intents": Several improvements to desktop files and caches Jerome Leclanche
• 2014/01/03 Re: open(1) removed from Debian? (was: 'open' instead of 'xdg-open' for usability?) Simon McVittie
• 2014/01/02 Re: problem nouveau Xorg reloc wait_idel failed: -16 Paul Menzel
• 2014/01/02 Re: problem nouveau Xorg reloc wait_idel failed: -16 kon/nos Enasxoliou
• 2014/01/02 problem nouveau Xorg reloc wait_idel failed: -16 kon/nos Enasxoliou
• 2013/12/31 Re: to-be-named Dominique Michel
• 2013/12/31 Re: to-be-named Andrea Zanellato
• 2013/12/31 Re: Desktop file spec improvements (was: Binary name in the desktop file) Jerome Leclanche
• 2013/12/31 Re: Desktop file spec improvements (was: Binary name in the desktop file) Jasper St. Pierre
• 2013/12/31 Re: Desktop file spec improvements (was: Binary name in the desktop file) Ryan Lortie
• 2013/12/31 Re: to-be-named Jasper St. Pierre
• 2013/12/31 Re: to-be-named Andrea Zanellato
• 2013/12/31 Re: to-be-named Matthias Klumpp
• 2013/12/31 Re: to-be-named Eike Hein
• 2013/12/31 Re: to-be-named Eike Hein
• 2013/12/31 Re: to-be-named Andrea Zanellato
• 2013/12/31 to-be-named Andrea Zanellato
• 2013/12/31 Re: Desktop file spec improvements (was: Binary name in the desktop file) Jerome Leclanche
• 2013/12/31 Re: Desktop file spec improvements (was: Binary name in the desktop file) David Faure
• 2013/12/31 Re: Desktop file spec improvements (was: Binary name in the desktop file) Jerome Leclanche
• 2013/12/31 Re: Desktop file spec improvements (was: Binary name in the desktop file) David Faure
• 2013/12/31 Re: Masking in the MIME magic spec David Faure
• 2013/12/31 Re: Desktop file spec improvements (was: Binary name in the desktop file) Ryan Lortie
• 2013/12/31 Re: Desktop file spec improvements (was: Binary name in the desktop file) David Faure
• 2013/12/31 Re: Question on desktop file exec lines David Faure
• 2013/12/30 Re: shared-mime-info: update-mime-database related question Kostya Berger
• 2013/12/30 Re: shared-mime-info: update-mime-database related question Kostya Berger
• 2013/12/30 Re: shared-mime-info: update-mime-database related question Jerome Leclanche
• 2013/12/30 shared-mime-info: update-mime-database related question Kostya Berger
• 2013/12/29 Re: Communication (was: Desktop file spec improvements (was: Binary name in the desktop file)) Dominique Michel
• 2013/12/29 Re: Desktop file spec improvements (was: Binary name in the desktop file) Ryan Lortie
• 2013/12/29 Re: Desktop file spec improvements (was: Binary name in the desktop file) Thiago Macieira
• 2013/12/29 Re: Desktop file spec improvements (was: Binary name in the desktop file) Jerome Leclanche
• 2013/12/29 Re: Desktop file spec improvements (was: Binary name in the desktop file) Thiago Macieira
• 2013/12/29 Desktop file spec improvements (was: Binary name in the desktop file) Jerome Leclanche
• 2013/12/29 Re: Binary name in the desktop file David Faure
• 2013/12/28 Re: Binary name in the desktop file Thiago Macieira
• 2013/12/28 Re: Binary name in the desktop file Thiago Macieira
• 2013/12/28 Re: Binary name in the desktop file Jerome Leclanche
• 2013/12/28 Re: Binary name in the desktop file Jasper St. Pierre
• 2013/12/28 Re: Binary name in the desktop file Thiago Macieira
• 2013/12/27 Re: Binary name in the desktop file Kevin Krammer
• 2013/12/27 Re: Binary name in the desktop file Jerome Leclanche
• 2013/12/27 Re: Binary name in the desktop file Kevin Krammer
• 2013/12/27 Re: Binary name in the desktop file Dominique Michel
• 2013/12/26 Re: Binary name in the desktop file Ma Xiaojun
• 2013/12/26 Re: Binary name in the desktop file Thomas Kluyver
• 2013/12/26 Re: Binary name in the desktop file Dominique Michel
• 2013/12/26 Re: Binary name in the desktop file Jerome Leclanche
• 2013/12/26 Re: Binary name in the desktop file Liam R E Quin
• 2013/12/26 Re: Binary name in the desktop file Jerome Leclanche
• 2013/12/26 Re: Binary name in the desktop file Jasper St. Pierre
• 2013/12/26 Re: Binary name in the desktop file Jerome Leclanche
• 2013/12/26 Re: Binary name in the desktop file Dominique Michel
• 2013/12/26 Re: Binary name in the desktop file Jerome Leclanche
• 2013/12/26 Re: Binary name in the desktop file Liam R E Quin
• 2013/12/26 Re: Binary name in the desktop file Jasper St. Pierre
• 2013/12/26 Re: Binary name in the desktop file Dominique Michel
• 2013/12/26 Re: Binary name in the desktop file Jerome Leclanche
• 2013/12/26 Re: Binary name in the desktop file Dominique Michel
• 2013/12/26 Re: Binary name in the desktop file Jerome Leclanche
• 2013/12/26 Re: Binary name in the desktop file Dominique Michel
• 2013/12/26 Re: Binary name in the desktop file Dominique Michel
• 2013/12/26 Re: Binary name in the desktop file Jerome Leclanche
• 2013/12/26 Re: Binary name in the desktop file Dominique Michel
• 2013/12/26 Re: Binary name in the desktop file Jerome Leclanche
• 2013/12/26 Re: Binary name in the desktop file Kevin Krammer
• 2013/12/26 Re: Binary name in the desktop file Jerome Leclanche
• 2013/12/26 Re: Binary name in the desktop file Kevin Krammer
• 2013/12/26 Re: Binary name in the desktop file Thiago Macieira
• 2013/12/26 Re: Binary name in the desktop file Ma Xiaojun
• 2013/12/26 Re: Binary name in the desktop file Jerome Leclanche
• 2013/12/26 Re: Binary name in the desktop file Thiago Macieira
• 2013/12/26 Re: Binary name in the desktop file Jerome Leclanche
• 2013/12/26 Re: Binary name in the desktop file Thiago Macieira
• 2013/12/26 Re: Binary name in the desktop file Kevin Krammer
• 2013/12/26 Re: Binary name in the desktop file Jerome Leclanche
• 2013/12/26 Re: Binary name in the desktop file Kevin Krammer
• 2013/12/26 Re: open(1) removed from Debian? (was: 'open' instead of 'xdg-open' for usability?) Kevin Krammer
• 2013/12/26 Re: Binary name in the desktop file Jerome Leclanche
• 2013/12/26 Re: Binary name in the desktop file Kevin Krammer
• 2013/12/26 Binary name in the desktop file Jerome Leclanche
• 2013/12/24 Re: open(1) removed from Debian? (was: 'open' instead of 'xdg-open' for usability?) Thomas Kluyver
• 2013/12/24 Re: open(1) removed from Debian? (was: 'open' instead of 'xdg-open' for usability?) Kevin Krammer
• 2013/12/24 Re: open(1) removed from Debian? (was: 'open' instead of 'xdg-open' for usability?) Thomas Kluyver
• 2013/12/24 Re: open(1) removed from Debian? (was: 'open' instead of 'xdg-open' for usability?) Kevin Krammer
• 2013/12/24 Re: open(1) removed from Debian? (was: 'open' instead of 'xdg-open' for usability?) Jerome Leclanche
• 2013/12/24 Re: open(1) removed from Debian? (was: 'open' instead of 'xdg-open' for usability?) Sanel Zukan
• 2013/12/24 Re: open(1) removed from Debian? (was: 'open' instead of 'xdg-open' for usability?) Dominique Michel
• 2013/12/23 Re: open(1) removed from Debian? (was: 'open' instead of 'xdg-open' for usability?) Ma Xiaojun
• 2013/12/23 Re: open(1) removed from Debian? (was: 'open' instead of 'xdg-open' for usability?) Liam R E Quin
• 2013/12/23 Question on desktop file exec lines Jerome Leclanche
• 2013/12/21 Re: open(1) removed from Debian? (was: 'open' instead of 'xdg-open' for usability?) Jerome Leclanche
• 2013/12/21 Re: open(1) removed from Debian? (was: 'open' instead of 'xdg-open' for usability?) Robert Qualls
• 2013/12/21 Re: open(1) removed from Debian? (was: 'open' instead of 'xdg-open' for usability?) Jerome Leclanche
• 2013/12/21 Re: open(1) removed from Debian? (was: 'open' instead of 'xdg-open' for usability?) Ma Xiaojun
• 2013/12/21 Re: open(1) removed from Debian? (was: 'open' instead of 'xdg-open' for usability?) Ma Xiaojun
• 2013/12/21 Re: open(1) removed from Debian? (was: 'open' instead of 'xdg-open' for usability?) Jerome Leclanche
• 2013/12/21 Re: open(1) removed from Debian? (was: 'open' instead of 'xdg-open' for usability?) Thomas Kluyver
• 2013/12/21 open(1) removed from Debian? (was: 'open' instead of 'xdg-open' for usability?) Ma Xiaojun
• 2013/12/21 Re: New handling for URI scheme handlers Jerome Leclanche
• 2013/12/21 Re: New handling for URI scheme handlers David Faure
• 2013/12/21 Re: application menu with full support for the additional categories David Faure
• 2013/12/21 Re: New handling for URI scheme handlers David Faure
• 2013/12/20 Re: Recognizing $XDG_GAMES_DIR Jerome Leclanche
• 2013/12/20 Re: Recognizing $XDG_GAMES_DIR Ingo Ruhnke
• 2013/12/20 Re: Recognizing $XDG_GAMES_DIR Rex Dieter
• 2013/12/20 Re: Recognizing $XDG_GAMES_DIR Jerome Leclanche
• 2013/12/20 Re: Recognizing $XDG_GAMES_DIR Robert Qualls

• Earlier messages
• Later messages