On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Jacek Caban <ja...@codeweavers.com> wrote: > Not really, good catch. We should make them consistent. Honestly, I'm > not sure which one is better. Both have their problems. Some functions > are forwarded, others are not, so having one debug channel would be > guarantee that we don't miss some calls while debugging a bug. However, > some functions have the same names and are not forwarded, so one debug > channel would be ambiguous. > > I'm open for opinions.
How about something like this: atl80.c: -BOOL WINAPI AtlAxWinInit(void) +BOOL WINAPI ATL80_AtlAxWinInit(void) atl80.spec: -42 stdcall AtlAxWinInit() +42 stdcall AtlAxWinInit() ATL80_AtlAxWinInit So we can always use one debug channel for all atlXX dlls, at the same time different exported function with the same name will generate different trace log. -- Regards, Qian Hong - http://www.winehq.org
