I guess the only way to find out is sending a patch to wine-patches. It would probably be acceptable, SetThreadStackGuarantee also returns true while doing nothing. By the way, this page might be more related to the function in question: http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=4985566 (search for 'boost')
Regards, Daniel 2013/5/26 Dan Kegel <d...@kegel.com> > http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22280 just got another dup. > > How awful would it be to make SetThreadPriorityBoost just > return success, as in the patch attached to > > http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22280#c1 > > > http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=27224&action=diff&context=patch&collapsed=&headers=1&format=raw > > ? We'd have to mark one more test TODO_WINE. > > Related if catty discussion: > http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2006/08/thread-priorities-are-evil.html > > >
