On Thu, 2 May 2013 23:26:24 +0100 (BST)
Hin-Tak Leung <ht...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> 
> - "volunteer" is what it means: "volunteer". To try to make anybody 
> "volunteer" in any activity any manner which is less than whole-heartedly 
> willingly, sounds wrong.
> 

Nobody's trying to make anyone volunteer. I doubt anyone will.  

> There is no reason why the AppDB shouldn't work that way. i.e. just deal with 
> the persistent ones, and let the individual readers skip over the occasional 
> rest as they come.

And who do you propose should "deal with" the persistent spammers? 

> To ban such exchanges - between people who ask for help and might even offer 
> incentives, and those who can offer help but not willing/possible to commit 
> to a regular role - seem over-zealous.     

We have a perfectly good user's forum for such exchanges. 

-- 
Rosanne DiMesio <dime...@earthlink.net>


Reply via email to