On Thu, 2 May 2013 23:26:24 +0100 (BST) Hin-Tak Leung <ht...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > > - "volunteer" is what it means: "volunteer". To try to make anybody > "volunteer" in any activity any manner which is less than whole-heartedly > willingly, sounds wrong. >
Nobody's trying to make anyone volunteer. I doubt anyone will. > There is no reason why the AppDB shouldn't work that way. i.e. just deal with > the persistent ones, and let the individual readers skip over the occasional > rest as they come. And who do you propose should "deal with" the persistent spammers? > To ban such exchanges - between people who ask for help and might even offer > incentives, and those who can offer help but not willing/possible to commit > to a regular role - seem over-zealous. We have a perfectly good user's forum for such exchanges. -- Rosanne DiMesio <dime...@earthlink.net>
