larmbr zhan <nasa4...@gmail.com> wrote: > + case VT_BOOL: > + *ret = V_BOOL(v) ? -1 : 0; > + break;
Shouldn't this be VARIANT_TRUE/VARIANT_FALSE instead of -1/0? -- Dmitry.
larmbr zhan <nasa4...@gmail.com> wrote: > + case VT_BOOL: > + *ret = V_BOOL(v) ? -1 : 0; > + break;
Shouldn't this be VARIANT_TRUE/VARIANT_FALSE instead of -1/0? -- Dmitry.