On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 6:32 AM, Detlef Riekenberg <wine....@web.de> wrote:
> Hi Dylan. > After testing your first Patch, i tried this one: > patching file dlls/riched20/tests/editor.c > Hunk #1 succeeded at 5826 (offset 23 lines). > Hunk #2 succeeded at 5856 (offset 23 lines). > Hunk #3 succeeded at 6281 (offset 23 lines). > patching file dlls/riched32/tests/editor.c > > All patches should apply clean. > When you send a Patchset, please mark them with [Patch x/y] > In this case, [Patch 1/8], [Patch 2/8], ... > I don't understand the problem with applying the patch. It applies cleanly for me, and it seems like it applied cleanly for you too. The changes are independent, so wouldn't that be a reason to not have them considered a patch set. > And again, new failures in win9x due to the use of UNICODE. > (The riched32 test already produce >40 failures in Win9x) > > I didn't view/test the following Patches. > Please inspect them also for UNICODE faults. > > Thanks for catching the Win9x problems, I'll fix the unicode problems before resending.
