On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 10:05:28AM +0100, Hans Leidekker wrote: > On Thursday 08 January 2009 00:05:01 Francois Gouget wrote:
>> memset(buffer, 0x55, sizeof(buffer)); >> - retval = pStringTableLookUpStringEx(table, uilevel, >> ST_CASE_SENSITIVE_COMPARE, buffer, (LPDWORD)0); >> + retval = pStringTableLookUpStringEx(table, uilevel, >> ST_CASE_SENSITIVE_COMPARE, buffer, NULL); >> ok(retval != ~0u, "failed find 'UILEVEL' in string table\n"); >> ok(memcmp(buffer, &data, 4), "unexpected data\n"); > This test is there to show that the prototype of StringTableLookUpStringEx > is broken; the last parameter is treated as an integer instead of a pointer > and this notation serves to document that fact. Wouldn't that actually be different type sizes under Win64? -- ----------------------------------------------------------- Paul "TBBle" Hampson, B.Sc, LPI, MCSE Very-later-year Asian Studies student, ANU The Boss, Bubblesworth Pty Ltd (ABN: 51 095 284 361) paul.hamp...@pobox.com Of course Pacman didn't influence us as kids. If it did, we'd be running around in darkened rooms, popping pills and listening to repetitive music. -- Kristian Wilson, Nintendo, Inc, 1989 License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/au/ -----------------------------------------------------------
pgp9b2ojhFzKx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
